Privitization Definition

PRIVATIZATION EASILY SHOWS WHY CASE CITES/CASE LAW IS NOT LAW AT ALL AND WHY CASE CITES SHOULD ONLY BE USED AS REFERENCE POINTS

Most Attorneys refer to case cites as case law EXAMPLE: “Roe V. Wade” in reality case cites are not laws at all; and are not applicable forms of adjudication; as every single case is unique by its own merits, elements, issues, circumstances people and situations, case cites sometimes set presidents; but in reality, should be forever banned from the court rooms now and in the future caused by the following irrefutable facts…  

FACT ONE: Since the year seventeen eighty nine (1789) the Supreme Court was built in Washington D.C. there are over one hundred million (100,000,000.00) published and un-published case cites, providing nothing more than mere opinions by thousands of judges, many whom are mostly deceased causing an inability to qualify “their” positions; in turn causing to have no standing whatsoever in any court; case cites are only reference points, not law;

FACT TWO: Caused by the current nineteen thirty three (1933) foreign state government under Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 (15); not limited to; “their” foreign state immunities act; “their” government officers of the court, attorneys and judges invariable; will always rule on the side of “their” municipal corporations; and not for the people, that our congressional law was meant to protect contrary to our government for the people by the people;   

FACT THREE: Only our House of Representatives, Congress and our State Legislatures can pass laws; under: “The Constitution for the united State of America;” contrary to “their” current practice of “their” officers of the courts legislating from the bench. Now all “their” defense attorneys first responsibility is to “their” court and then to you!

FACT FOUR: Case cites are a simple means of transference of liability; thru “their” current practice of judges legislating from the bench. In order for judges not to be prosecuted for felonious or improper rulings; judges are simply utilizing numerous case cites and opinions of other judges who are mostly deceased. Wherefore judge[s] cannot be sued for transferring “their” liability upon other judges, rulings, decisions and opinions that are deceased.

FACT FIVE: The united States Congress does not pass case cites, thus case cites are not laws period;

FACT SIX: All case cites although setting presidents are nothing more than judgments, rulings and opinions: “THEY ARE NOT LAW!” Only Congress and the State Legislatures pass laws, not judges or courts;

FACT SEVEN: For every case cite, lies many counter case cites.

“FOR THE RECORD ATTORNEYS ARE VERSED IN PROCEDURE”
LAWYERS ARE VERSED IN LAW
SO WHAT ARE BARRISTERS VERSED IN?

“ATTORNEYS AT BAR MEAN BRITISH ACCREDITED REGISTRY (BAR)”
SO WHAT HAPPENED TO COMMON LAW ATTORNEYS?

“ASK YOU’RE LICENSED BAR ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS”
SEE WHAT THEY SAY!  

“ASK THEM WHY THE WORD LICENSE IS OMMITTED FROM THEIR BAR CARD”
SEE WHAT THEY SAY!
“NOW ASK THEM TO SEE THEIR ACTUAL LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW”
AND SEE WHAT THEY SAY?

“THEN ASK US AND SEE WHAT WE SAY”

“TOP OF THE CLASS”

Wherefore by; not limited to; the above 1-7 facts “their” legislation is not through positive law

In most areas people are placed in awkward positions during a burglary having to crawl out of a window or desperately plead for help on a telephone, if they can reach one and help usually is too late. We the people for the people by the people cannot boldly confront armed lawbreakers without weapons. The old adage is; if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns is true! Common law is the protection of rights. It is founded upon principles of self reliance and corresponding personal responsibility. True Government is servants who get paid by We the people for the people in our Republic thru government public servants “oath of offices.” A Republic is ruled by law, common law, not ruler's maritime law. When asked what form of government we have been given? Benjamin Franklin Replied: A Republic, Sir, if you can keep it!' God help you, if you fail to keep it!! Any Questions so Far? 

So remember the right to keep and bear arms is a popular maxim of common law. A brief discussion of this right will serve to illustrate some differences between equity and common law. In the words of Thomas Jefferson: “The primary purpose of the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves from government tyranny.” John Adams said: “Arms in the hands of the citizen may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny, or private self defense.” George Mason said: I ask, sir, what is the militia? “It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.” Today municipalities and even states pass legislation and ordinances restricting our right to keep and bear arms for personal defense. Confiscatory gun legislation is forbidden by our constitution. For some reason, justified only in “their” liberal terms of insanity “they” seem to feel that only police and armies should bear arms to protect themselves.

Yet it is incredibly obvious throughout the history of the world that the very first act of tyrants is disarming people just before violating our rights. The first act, Hitler took after coming to power was to confiscate weapons. Stalin did the very same thing, as did MaoTse Tung. King George attempted to do the same thing to the colonists but they wouldn't stand for it. And the massacre in Beijing would never have happened had people been properly armed.

We have a few packages to start so consider the benefits of each package: